Fantasy Leagues
It’s amazing how we Americans can take something very simple, contort it ten different ways, and make it new and fascinating. Take football, for example. You had the forward pass, followed by the spread, then the West Coast offense. On defense, you went from the 4-3, to the 3-4 to the Cover 2, to whatever Bill Belichik could dream up next.
Not only did play improve, but safety did, too. Cloth helmets gave way to real helmets with face guards. Pads were introduced. Then we added penalities to regulate the game and protect the players.
Not only are things more interesting for the athletes, but fans have devised new and more exciting ways to watch the game as well. If we go to the game, we tailgate, and maybe end up at the bar afterwards. At home, we have the huge plasma screen, and entertain our friends for twenty-something consecutive Sundays as though we could afford to party all the time.
Even the geeks have found ways to improve their participation and enjoyment in the game. First, it was Strat-o-Matic, then fantasy leagues. We not only followed our favorite team, but found reasons to follow the other thirty-one teams regardless of how good or bad they were. We hold mock drafts. We trade up and down in the draft. We even join a second or third fantasy league if we can’t get enough.
Thanks to Roger Goodell and Jim Irsay, however, we’ve come to realize that one more component needs to be added to this fantasy league bonanza. We missed it all this time. Why? Because we were selfish. We wanted OUR team to win. We wanted OUR players to do well. We wanted to win our fantasy league championship.
How self-centered of us? We were missing out on the most important part of professional football.
What is that, you say?
Political affiliation.
Yep, that’s right. Starting next year, YoHoo Sports is upgrading its fantasy football leagues to include a “political beliefs” factor for each player. Within each fantasy league, this “political beliefs” factor will be multiplied to a player’s (individual stats) or team’s (defense) fantasy stats to determine the true points earned by each fantasy team. Say you have Big Ben on your team, and say he is conservative. His political beliefs factor may read .2, meaning each point he earns during the game is only worth .2 the total points. On the other hand, Chad Ochocinco’s 1.8 rating (highly liberal) would earn him more game points.
It’s a risk some fantasy team owners may be willing to take. Sure, it makes it difficult for owners to select conservative players, but that’s not a problem. As the fantasy league market starts to make an impact on the pro football level, owners and GM’s will quickly learn that it is wise for them not to select conservative athletes for their teams at all. Everybody wins – the fans, the league, and the owners. Everybody, of course, except for the exceptional conservative athletes.
Light Headed
Since Kelly Clarkson’s American Idol appearance last Wednesday, this blog has been read over 300 times by people searching on some term using her name followed by either “fat”, “skinny” or “chunky”. Note that this does not include the hits taken for the same on Carrie Underwood. In all, this site had over 350 hits in four days because people were obsessed with other people’s weight.
Don’t these guys have anything better to do? Obama is a train wreck, 401k plans have become 201k accounts, and Nance Pelosi wants to give authority over your kids to the U.N. And these guys are worried about the weight of our singers. You, my friends, are the idiot of the week.

The award, by the way, is very light. Which pretty much matches your brain power.
It’s Called “The Super Bowl”
The NFL playoffs started last week, starting the progressive elimination of teams until only two remain to play in “the big game”.
The big game.
Doesn’t sound right to say it that way, does it? But that is the way you have to say it, if you are advertising your wares and have not bought into the official licensing agreement of the NFL to use the term “Super Bowl”. So let me, on behalf of all those companies and advertisers that could receive a boost from sales but refuse to pay licensing fees to the NFL, say something:
SUPER BOWL
SUPER BOWL
SUPER BOWL
SUPER BOWL
SUPER BOWL
SUPER BOWL
SUPER BOWL
SUPER BOWL
SUPER BOWL
SUPER BOWL
The NFL makes enough money, you’d think they could use some of their goodwill to help companies instead of taking more money from them. NFL: You are my idiots of the week.

To the NFL
The NFL is not the only winner of the award this week. No, I have a winner from last week, too, but did not have time to post. The title of this version of the award is “How Not to Show Your Impartiality”. Tell me if you’ve heard this one:
A media outlet that has a reputation for leaning right, but occasionally conducts on air conversations with an acerbic liberal writer, schedules another TV segment with this writer. The station knows the writer has a book to promote, and they have no problem scheduling the writer, who will increase ratings, cause additional dialog and keep their station in the news for a couple days, if not for a full week.
The author’s latest book, though, points out some glaring biases in this station’s programming and coverage of the recent election cycle. Realizing what this could mean to the station, and how they have a reputation to uphold with their viewers, permanently cancel the interview, and replace the author with one of the most vitriolic, right-wing on air personalities. Because, of course, the best way for this station to disprove its right-wing bias is to cancel a scheduled appointment of the liberal author and replace the author with someone even more right-wing than the media outlet’s reputation.
Right?
Oh, one more thing. The story is actually reversed: it was a left-leaning outlet that did this to an acerbic right-wing author. You can read about it here. Great job, NBC in general and the Today Show in particular. Way to show your impartiality. You win last week’s IOTW award:

Good job, NBC
It really is a good thing that the Fairness Doctrine would fix these kinds of issues across the media. Oh, it doesn’t affect television, only radio? How shocking!
Predictive Blogging
Let’s just get this out of the way now, shall we? Considering all anyone will hear at the Thursday night VP candidate debate is either crickets or “blah, blah, blah”, I figured I would pre-declare this week’s Idiots of the Week.
Of course, as your dear editor and publisher of SMISLT, unlike the major media outlets, I will be more than willing to correct my mistake if I am wrong. But, for some ungodly reason, I don’t think I have to worry about that.
Let’s hit the candidates first. No, silly, not the VP candidates, the Idiot of the Week candidates (in no particular order):
- Sarah Palin – will parrot John McCain’s campaign lines, especially since playing the maverick would be completely out of line with McCain’s vote on the Senate version of the non-bank bank bailout bill.
- Joe Biden – will say lots of dumb things. After tonight’s Senate vote, he really does not need to say anything of substance anyway, since McCain and the other Republican Senators handed Obama the keys to daddy’s car.
- The RNC / McCain campaign – just for existing
- The DNC / Obama campaign – for existing as a facade, and not showing America how Obama would preside over this great nation.
- The MSM – Biden will be awesome as the affable goofball – you know, your oddball uncle? – yet still manage to look Vice Presidential. Palin will look like someone that did not go to an Ivy League school, and is out of touch with Washington DC politics. But they will get it right that Republicans sold their minions down the river.
- Fox News – McCain is doing the right thing for the country, and conservatives just need to stick with him.
- The zealots in both parties, via blogs – libs will say they are 3.5 months away from living in utopia; conservatives will say they are that far away from living in hell.
What I wrote initially upon drafting this post, prior to the Senate vote:
The winner will end up being none of them. It will be President George Bush. Why? Because practically everything will point back to his failed policies, his inability to support his base, and his overwhelming urge to “reach across the aisle” with people who really don’t want to co-habitate the Federal government. Even when things should also point to Clinton, Bush I, and Carter, they won’t. They will point to Bush, because he is the magnet, whether right or wrong. But I say, “Mostly right.”
Strike that; reverse it. Not because the sentiment was wrong, though.
What I say now is:
The winner will be the Republican Party, for failing to realize, yet again, that you don’t negotiate with terrorists and you don’t turn your back on your constituents. They just don’t get it, and deserve to die as a party. I’d say the same about the Democratic Party, but they will eventually steal the name “the American People’s Party” (or is that the People’s Party of America?) when over 60% of the voting population declares that all big industry should be controlled by the legislature.
Maybe I’ll be the idiot; regardless of how this whole mess turns out, I’ll still spend 90 minutes of my Thursday night watching the debate, if only to confirm how far the Republican Party has fallen.
Fascinating!!!
Fascinate me!
Exhilarate me!
Invigorate me!
Captivate me!
Isn’t that how you feel after the latest rounds of politicians throwing semi-true jabs at the opposing political party; entertainers going whole hog for the black democrat male and decrying the white republican female; the media vetting the white republican female100x over yet not vetting the black democrat male – actually hiding his ties to radical socialists; the Christian political establishment acting all, well, like lemmings again; and the incumbents – yes, all of them – blaming everyone but themselves for the years worth of legislation that helped contribute to the ongoing mortgage crisis?
No?!? What on earth have you been doing then?
It has consumed me, to the extent that my schedule allows me to consumed. It almost made me forget about all of the following:
- My beloved Cleveland Indians being swept for the weekend – a Saturday double-header and a Sunday game – by the lowly Kansas City Royals. When does next year start?
- My beloved Ohio State Buckeyes getting slaughtered in another big game, as the same cast of characters that lost their cool and proved themselves too slow in last year’s BCS game – it only takes a handful of them to make a team totally overmatched – did it again. (But, man, I’d love to have Malcom Jenkins as a starting cornerback on my team!)
- The Cleveland Browns proving themselves absolutely inept. If you didn’t notice, I did not use the adjective “beloved” to describe this motley crew.
No, I did not say Motley Crue.

It also didn’t make me forget about the Vince Young saga. This guy was on top of the world at Texas, and in his first year with the Tennessee Titans. What happened?
That’s easy. Fans did what they do best. They called talk shows. They booed Young. They ranted on blogs.
And how did Vince Young’s mom take it? She told the world to leave her son alone. I wish I had as many people uplifting my self-esteem as Young has had in his many years in sports. Think of all the money I’d have…and how difficult it would be for me to overcome failure. This is the American Idol reality, the no-score league aftermath, the patsi-fying of our utes (yes, I said “utes”).
Failure. It’s not your fault, and the other person really isn’t better than you. It’s all in your imagination. You really are special. No one is as good as you in anything. And everyone really should bow down to you.
You are special. Don’t believe me? Just ask your therapist.
Then try to get a job that promotes based on merit, and get a grip.
That wasn’t too mean now, was it?
Inflation in the Modern Era
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Is your blog getting the number of daily hits that you expect?
Are you writing great material that is going unnoticed?
Looking for a pick-me-up? A little blog stimulation? Some artificial growth that lasts beyond four hours? You know, Viagra for your blog?
I have the cure, and it doesn’t have all those crazy side-effects. Well, except for the one where you worry about the mindset of the people viewing your site. But, we live in America, and are only concerned with uninhibited growth (ask our mega-churches, truth be damned!) and popularity (ask our politicians, athletes, and entertainers). Substance is irrelevant; growth is king!
We will make this post all about the numbers. Let’s go for the gold! We’ll keep it cheap and dispensable. Follow my lead:
- Pick a topic that is somewhat relevant, such as the mindless viewing and reading habits of the American male. Or the dumbing down of communication of all types – especially in ads and speeches.
- Figure out a way to include the name of a cute, skinny, white female celebrity. But, wait! I want a story with integrity, with meaning, with…with…CONTEXT! So what? Then create a dumb, boring blog that no one reads. Pick celebrities that fit the story, or just put them (Jessica Simpson) where you want. It really (Christina Aguilera) does not matter all that much. Just ask Carrie Underwood. Or Fergie. It’s all about the children (Miley Cyrus), so do what you can! Pink doesn’t count, and neither does Rihanna.
- Rinse and repeat, about as often as Paris Hilton, Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan make the news.
Hey, if politicians can convert meaningless drivel into millions of votes, why can’t name dropping (Taylor Swift, Kelly Clarkson, Nastia Luken) work for blogs?
It is inflation that I can believe in.
No skinny white chicks were hurt in the creating of this post.
Tae Kwon Dumb
The Olympics made for must-see-TV for our entire family, from me right down to my six-year-old son. My wife was taken in by the gymnastics – she always is – and my daughter enjoyed watching everything in sight. My son just wanted the USA to win everything; he is ultra-competitive and couldn’t stand it when the “home team” lost. Oh, and I think he developed his first crush, too, on this gal:
We walked into a WalMart and into the electronics area where all of the TVs were showing – of course – the Olympics. During a gold medal montage, we saw swimming, track, volleyball, and gymnastics. My son knew the names of several of the performers, but only named one. It’s not the first time that happened during these Olympics.
But with the thrill of victory comes the agony of defeat, unsportsmanlike conduct, and hot air. The hot air came courtesy of IOC President, Jacques Rogge, who saw fit to criticize Usain Bolt’s celebrations more so than to criticize China, which tried to obfuscate when journalists foraged for evidence that China misrepresented the ages of some girls on their gymnastics team. Geez, Louise, Jacque (do you like Jerry Lewis, too?), way to show off your power. I could knock on Bolt for acting like someone who just won the biggest sporting event of his lifetime, too. But I think I’ll refrain from that. I probably wrote more about the Chinese gymnastics team here than Jacque mentioned about it. What’s the Arabic term for “Chinese dhimmi” again?
Unsportsmanlike conduct was delivered by the Cuban Tae Kwon Do (TKD) competitor Angel Matos, who delivered the agony of da feet to TKD referee Chakir Chelbat for disqualifying him. Adding insult (stupidy?) to injury was Fidel Castro’s defense of Matos. Of course, Cuba’s teams are shrinking and becoming less competitive because of the draw of greenbacks from that place up north (no, not Michigan). Fidel…buy a clue!!!
(And, Fidel, karma isn’t on your side, either. Tropical Storm Gustav may have its way with you.)
Thankfully, Tae Kwon Do officials know better, and are attempting to get Matos banned from the sport for life. My kids take Tae Kwon Do, and they know the guiding principles of the discipline. Maybe Matos ought to learn them, too.
To all those Olympians who did their best – whether they won or lost – congratulations! You served your countries proudly.
To Rogge, Matos, Castro and the “Chinese behind the curtain” at the Olympics, I have one more award for you:

And now I know why Guns & Roses named their “next” album “Chinese Democracy”…cuz it’ll never happen.
-
Archives
- October 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (6)
- March 2009 (14)
- February 2009 (13)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (5)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (7)
- September 2008 (6)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


